Arthur Russell, “Nobody Wants a Lonely Heart”
[I wrote this last week, before my birthday, which is 9/18, AKA the one-week anniversary of 9/11.]
28 does not feel old to me, not since I began differentiating between capital-A Ages like 35 and 40, breaking them down into actual possible years rather than some floating gray mass over the horizon. It is true, however, that 28 feels old if I think back to 22 and take in how much opportunity was squandered. But I can forgive myself for it, because I didn’t know better, and it’s hard now to see a way that I could have done differently.
Recently I diagnosed myself with an addiction to wistfulness. (I don’t know how else to justify the constant stream of “Office” reruns playing in my apartment for the past 18 months. Or the Garrison Keillor stuff—I acknowledge that’s really weird.) Part of wistfulness is displacement, because you lament where you are compared to where you once were; you look tenderly at where you were and bittersweetly at where you are; part of you wishes that you were somewhere else and that part is, indeed, somewhere else.
I am comfortable with displacement to the point of seeking it. At school I have become skilled at avoiding associations, avoiding personal obligations, a ninja at slipping through cracks. Of course it is a lifelong practice, not something mastered overnight. Here is an Eddie fun fact: This one time, I labored under the notion of being in love with a girl who lived in another place, and I used that notional love to distance myself from actual girls whom I was actually dating. And this “one time” lasted for six years, ha-ha!
Events in the summer caused me to look squarely at this constant wistfulness and get some self-awareness about it. Suddenly I thought, Why would you want to be here but not here? Why would you want to let that have so much power over how you feel and how you treat people?
And so I began identifying instances of my tendency for wistfulness. The music I listen to is heartsick with it. The fiction I read fetishizes it. Certain relationships are constructed specifically to perpetuate it. Even the way I dress could be construed as an expression of it, because I am always wearing ties or jackets but in this sloppy way that says, “I probably care more about being somewhere else.”
Illustrative anecdote: My program at school has us go to one session with a voice coach. I went yesterday to a small office and read aloud a paper while a lady videotaped me. I did a crappy job. She asked what I had thought about while I read; I said that I thought about how I didn’t like the paper and so couldn’t “sell” it convincingly. Here is what she said. “Focus on the connection being made with the people who are listening. Don’t back away from what you’re reading; commit to it.” She did not realize that she would be supplying the moral lesson to my Livejournal entry. I read the paper again and got high marks.
First there is my glamorization of this wistfulness and heartsickness, and then there is my allowing it to forge a basic personality trait. Why would I want to be marked by heartsickness? I take as a sign of hope that my identifying it is coupled with a desire to (1) explain how it became so deeply rooted, (2) show compassion toward it, and (3) change it. For me that change looks like committing to experiences and people, standing with two feet on the ground instead of fidgeting from one foot to the other.
Broad strokes are made of small lines, and I am unsure about changing some habits. It might be beyond me, for instance, to love the horrible, fast Otis Redding songs in place of the good, slow, sad ones. Also I am actively trying to make a friend in New Haven who has cable TV so that I can see new episodes of “The Office.”